Archives For Fluoridation

Is Eureka Springs the next city to have lead-poisoned water?

By now, you’ve heard about the lead-poisoned water in Flint, Michigan and also in some areas of Ohio. (Newer articles about Flint’s HIGH lead levels here and here.) It’s only a matter of time before more states realize that there may be increased lead levels in their own public water supplies, too! Becky Gillette, reporter […]

Ohio’s Water Lead Poisoned… and ADH Mtg 1/28/16 Reminder

SPECIAL NOTE AND REMINDER: Arkansas Dept of Health (ADH) Meeting:  Thursday, January 28, 2016 is the kick-off date for the quarterly meeting for the Arkansas Department of Health. Secure Arkansas thinks this first meeting will set their agenda for the year as well as policy for the upcoming legislative session for 2017.  This will affect […]

The Tangled Web of the CDC & ADH! (Flint, Michigan fiasco, too)

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CANNOT be trusted. Government Safety Regulations Lag Behind Science Substance Introduced Banned DDT 1939 1972 Asbestos 1890 1973 (only a partial ban) Leaded gas 1924 1996 DES (Diethylstilbestrol)     1940 1975 Fluoride 1945 toxic fluoride poison is still protected by CDC, EPA, & FDA In the above table […]

CMS Lynn Mouden – The Fox is in the Hen House with $800 Billion

This is an open appeal for Arkansas Governor Hutchinson to call for a moratorium on fluoridation/Act 197 of 2011. Wake up, everyone! Do your own research on fluoridation, seek the truth, weigh the facts, follow the money, and find out what’s really true before it’s too late and nothing can be done regarding this toxic […]

Part 6: Rebuttal to ADH Fluoridation Testimony to Ark. Joint Health Committee 10/05/15 (minutes 54-1:02)

Dr. John A. Yiamouyiannis published a  paper entitled  "Water Fluoridation and Tooth Decay: Results From the 1986-1987 National Survey of US. Schoolchildren" in the Fluoride, Journal of The International Society for Fluoride Research (Volume 23, No. 2; April 1990; pp 55-67). The conclusion of this paper showed that there was NO significant difference in tooth […]


Next Page
Previous Page